Accessibility

Journal publishing now entails delivery through a wide range of output devices including phones, handhelds, eBook readers, and personal computers, as well as the more historically important print pages and CD-ROMs. Journal articles are provided in a variety of formats including XML, PDF, HTML, several eBook formats, and DAISY for pronouncing software. At the same time, governmental regulation and web best practice (as promulgated by the World Wide Web Consortium (W3C)) have led to requirements for better access for the visually and motor impaired. For papers that fall in the purview of the United States government, the relevant accessibility guidance comes from the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 § 508, as amended by the Workforce Investment Act of 1998 (P.L. 105 – 220), 29 U.S.C. § 794d (typically known as Section 508). For the web, the W3C has published the WCAG 2.0: Web Accessibility Guidelines 2.0 (WCAG 2.0). The two specifications have been declared to be complimentary, with the techniques of the WCAG 2.0 used to meet the stated Section 508 guidelines. At the level applicable to this Tag Set, both of these accessibility frameworks concern themselves with how those with impaired sight or motor control operate a website built for a seeing, fully manipulatory world.
Section 508 deals with such visual and handling aspects as screen flicker, electronic forms, scripting, and color. The WCAG 2.0 guidelines range from the recommendation that web pages be well formed, through techniques for pausing and linking, to specifics on web page design. Since the Journal Article Tag Set does not deal with the look and feel or the behavior of a journal article, but rather with the intellectual content, many of the Section 508 guidelines and WCAG 2.0 techniques do not apply directly to this Tag Set. But certain elements and attributes in this Tag Set enable a publisher, archive, author, aggregator, or other interested party to implement Section 508-compliant or WCAG-accessible display of material based on XML documents tagged with this Tag Set. The intent is that this Tag Set should not prevent and should actively enable Section 508 compliance and WCAG techniques of best accessibility practice.
For example, the Section 508 website (http://www.section508.gov), under 508 Standards, Subpart B -- Technical Standards, § 1194.22 Web-based intranet and internet information and applications, states that “A text equivalent for every non-text element shall be provided”. This Tag Set does not require that each graphic, for example, also have a non-text companion, but there are three enabling elements available within each <graphic> element to make that possible. A <graphic> may contain:
This model for a graphic also enables WCAG 2.0: Techniques and Failures for Web Accessibility Guidelines 2.0 (December 2008) #G73: “Providing a long description in another location with a link to it that is immediately adjacent to the non-text content” and #G95: “Providing short text alternatives that provide a brief description of non-text content”.

Using @alt for Pronunciation

Sometimes an abbreviation (<abbrev>) needs to be pronounced in a way that is not reflected in its content or its tagging. The @alt attribute (available on many elements) can be used to record the pronunciation for screen readers and other accessibility devices. For example, the abbreviation “WHO” might be better pronounced as “World Health Organization” (alt="World Health Organization") or as “W.H.O.” than as the word “who”. The @alt attribute can also be used to provide the textual interpretation of a symbol such as an emoticon (e.g., for “;-)” use an @alt attribute value such as “alt="smile-wink"”).
Sometimes a <label> needs to be pronounced in a way that is not reflected in its content or its tagging. The @alt attribute can be used to record the pronunciation for screen readers and other accessibility devices. For example, the statement label that follows might be pronounced as “Proof 3”.
<statement>
<label alt="Equation 3">Equation&#x00A0;III.</label>
...</statement>
In the same way, an <xref> may need to be pronounced in a way that is not reflected in its content or its tagging. The @alt attribute can be used to record the pronunciation for screen readers and other accessibility devices. For example, the cross-reference to a Statement label that follows might be pronounced as “Statement 4”.
... See <xref alt="Statement 4">Statement&#x00A0;IV.</xref>...

Short Pronouncing Abstract

For accessibility purposes, it is useful to provide a very short synopsis abstract (much like a Table of Contents blurb or a dek in some journals) whose purpose is to tell a non-sighted reader what the document is about. This abstract can be given the @abstract-type value such as “meta-description”, “description”, or “dc:description” to indicate that, when making web pages from this XML, the abstract can be used to create the XHTML metadata description.

Use of <alt-text>

Best practice reserves the <alt-text> element for accessibility uses such as pronouncing screen readers. This element should not be used as a replacement for <caption>, which is a visual element that is typically displayed alongside a figure, table, etc. The <alt-text> is not a visual element, unless the figure, caption, or other major element that holds the <alt-text> is not available or cannot be processed by the person or device-type being addressed. Since it is not visual, <alt-text> does not allow face markup inside it; a simplified textual alternative for a graphical object (including face markup) can be created using the <textual-form> element.

Use of <alternatives>

The <alternatives> element provides a container for collecting multiple versions of a single graphical or media object, for example, to provide a textual alternative to a graphic or media object or to provide an additional enlarged graphic for accessibility. By providing this container element for a graphical or media object, this element enables certain W3C Techniques for WCAG 2.0 (December 2008):
  • #G58: “Placing a link to the alternative for time-based media immediately next to the non-text content”
  • #G68: “Providing a descriptive label that describes the purpose of live audio-only and live video-only content”
  • #G69: “Providing an alternative for time based media”
  • #H86: Providing text alternatives for ASCII art, emoticons, and leetspeak

WCAG 2.0 Techniques and Failures guidelines

Here are some additional examples of elements and attributes in this Tag Set that enable techniques as described in the WCAG 2.0 Techniques and Failures guidelines:

Article Authoring Tag Library NISO JATS Version 1.1 (ANSI/NISO Z39.96-2015)

Version of December 2015

Back to Top