<response>
Response
Reply, response, or commentary concerning the journal article. In the typical case, the
response is included in the same XML package as the original article, attached at the end of the
article proper. Metadata that differs from that of the original article (for example, title, author), may be captured using the <front-stub> element; if the <front-stub> element is used, any metadata not specifically tagged is inherited from the original article.
Remarks
Related Essay: For a discussion on the use of <response>, see Tagging Letters and Replies.
Usage: Frequently, a reply or response is an article in its own right, not included as part of the original article. Such an article could use the <related-article> element in the article metadata to record the metadata for the original article.
The response construction can also be used for the pathological case, rarely seen, in which several responses to an article are lumped together into a single container that is not the original article, merely a collection of responses. (In one example we examined, the first two responses were to an original article that was elsewhere, and the third response was a response to the first two responses.)
Attributes
Content Model
<!ELEMENT response %article-short-model; >
Expanded Content Model
((front | front-stub), body?, back?, floats-group?)
Description
The following, in order:
- Any one of:
- <body> Body of the Document, zero or one
- <back> Back Matter, zero or one
- <floats-group> Floating Element Group, zero or one
This element may be contained in:
Example
<article dtd-version="1.1"> <front> <journal-meta> <journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">JCM</journal-id> <issn>0095-1137</issn> <publisher><publisher-name>JCM</publisher-name></publisher> </journal-meta> <article-meta> <article-id pub-id-type="pmid">0547</article-id> <article-categories> <subj-group><subject>Letter to the Editor</subject></subj-group> </article-categories> <title-group> <article-title><italic>Acrophialophora fusispora</italic> Misidentified as <italic>Scedosporium prolificans</italic></article-title> </title-group> <contrib-group> <contrib contrib-type="author"> <name><surname>Guarro*</surname> <given-names>Josep</given-names></name> <xref ref-type="aff"><sup><italic>a</italic></sup></xref> </contrib> <contrib contrib-type="author"> <name><surname>Gené</surname> <given-names>Josepa</given-names></name> <xref ref-type="aff"><sup><italic>a</italic></sup></xref> </contrib> </contrib-group> <aff>...</aff> <pub-date publication-format="print" date-type="pub" iso-8601-date="2002"> <year>2002</year></pub-date> <volume>40</volume><issue>9</issue> <fpage>42</fpage><lpage>43</lpage> <permissions> <copyright-statement>Copyright © 2002, British Medical Journal</copyright-statement> <copyright-year>2002</copyright-year> </permissions> </article-meta> </front> <body> <sec> <title>Comment Letter 1</title> <p>Arthur et al. reported an interesting case of human keratouveitis associated with the intraocular long-term retention of a contact lens, ...</p> </sec> </body> <back> <ref-list>...</ref-list> </back> <response response-type="reply"> <front> <journal-meta>...</journal-meta> <article-meta> <article-id>mul356</article-id> <title-group> <article-title>Comment Letter 2</article-title> </title-group> <contrib-group> <contrib contrib-type="author"> <name><surname>Sigler*</surname> <given-names>Lynne</given-names></name> <xref ref-type="aff"><sup><italic>a</italic></sup></xref> </contrib> <contrib contrib-type="author"> <name><surname>Sutton</surname> <given-names>Deanna A.</given-names></name> <xref ref-type="aff"><sup><italic>b</italic></sup></xref> </contrib> </contrib-group> <aff>...</aff> ... </article-meta> </front> <body> <p>We are writing concerning the identification of the fungus causing keratouveitis ...</p> </body> <back> <ref-list>...</ref-list> </back> </response> <response response-type="reply"> <front> <journal-meta>...</journal-meta> <article-meta> <article-id>mul987</article-id> <title-group> <article-title>Authors' Reply</article-title> </title-group> <contrib-group> <contrib contrib-type="author"> <name><surname>Arthur*</surname> <given-names>Stella</given-names></name> <xref ref-type="aff"><sup><italic>a</italic></sup></xref> </contrib> <contrib contrib-type="author"> <name><surname>Steed</surname> <given-names>Lisa L.</given-names></name> <xref ref-type="aff"><sup><italic>a</italic></sup></xref> </contrib> </contrib-group> <aff>...</aff> ... </article-meta> </front> <body> <p>We read with great interest and much chagrin the letters to the editor by Drs. Sigler and Sutton and Drs. Guarro and Gene correcting our misidentification of <italic>Acrophialophora fusispora</italic> ...</p> ... </body> <back> <ref-list>...</ref-list> </back> </response> </article>